Three Jewels

Foundation • Module 2

• Introduction
• Video 1: The Buddha
• Bridge: Who Was Speaking?
• Video 2: The Dharma
• A Few Insights
• Questions for Reflection

Estimated time to complete: 40 minutes

Return to the Foundation Syllabus

The Context for What You Experienced

You now have something to investigate. Whatever happened when you tried to sit still and watch your breath—the wandering, the questioning, the moments of settling, the return—you’ve encountered firsthand the mind that Buddhist philosophy examines. The restlessness wasn’t an obstacle to meditation; it was meditation showing you its subject matter.

But what exactly are we investigating? And how do we investigate it systematically rather than just sitting with confusion?

This is where context becomes essential. Buddhism developed over two thousand years of sustained inquiry into precisely the condition you experienced: a mind that cannot simply rest, that generates dissatisfaction automatically, that seeks something other than what is present. The tradition offers not just techniques but frameworks for understanding what those techniques reveal—maps of territory you’ve now begun to walk.

The traditional entry point is called the Three Jewels, or Three Refuges: Buddha, Dharma, and Saṅgha. When someone formally becomes a Buddhist, they “take refuge” in these three. But you don’t need to become Buddhist to find them useful. Think of them as three orienting questions: Who investigated this before me? What did they discover? Who else is investigating?

The Buddha answers the first question. Here was a human being—not a god, not a prophet—who reportedly investigated the same restless mind you just encountered and saw through its mechanism completely. His story matters not as religious history but as proof of concept: someone did this investigation thoroughly and came to understand something that transformed how he experienced being alive. The title “Buddha” means “awakened one,” and it’s not exclusive to him—the tradition holds that anyone who completes such an investigation earns the same title.

The Dharma answers the second question. This Sanskrit word means both “teaching” and “truth” or “reality”—what the Buddha taught, and the reality his teaching points toward. The Dharma includes philosophical frameworks, meditation instructions, and ethical guidelines, but fundamentally it’s an analysis of the mechanism you glimpsed: how the mind constructs dissatisfaction, and how that construction can be seen through.

The Saṅgha answers the third question. You’re not alone in finding this investigation difficult. The Saṅgha is the community of those who practice and preserve these teachings—monastics and laypeople, across cultures and centuries, who have taken up the same inquiry.

The two videos in this module introduce the first two jewels. The first examines who the Buddha was and what “awakening” means as a title rather than a unique identity. The second explores the Dharma through four analogies that reveal how Buddhist teaching actually works. Pay attention to these analogies—Arrow, Goldsmith, Raft, and Dream—they will serve as reference points throughout your study.

What to watch for: The meaning of “Buddha” as a title rather than a name. The four phases of his life story and their connection to pilgrimage sites. Why the tradition insists he was a human being rather than a god or prophet.

The Buddha

Duration: 17 minutes

“Buddha” is a title meaning “awakened one,” not a unique identity—the tradition holds that anyone who completes such an investigation can earn the same title. This is a crucial distinction. We’re not studying someone fundamentally different from us, but someone who reportedly did thoroughly what we’ve just begun: investigated the restless, dissatisfied mind and saw through its mechanism.

His life story divides into four phases, each connected to a major pilgrimage site: birth and early life (Lumbinī), search and awakening (Bodh Gayā), teaching (Sārnāth), and death (Kuśinagar). An optional module explores these phases in depth—not as religious history, but as the tradition’s primary teaching on what a meaningful life looks like, how meditation connects to discovering that meaning, and what the “ideal life” might actually involve. The Buddha’s story is how Buddhists have transmitted these questions for twenty-five centuries. If you want that foundation, take the deep dive after completing this module.

But for now, the key point is simpler: here was a human being who took the condition you experienced in meditation—that inability to simply rest, that automatic generation of seeking and dissatisfaction—and made it the subject of sustained investigation. He reportedly awoke from what he called “the painful nightmare of cyclic existence.” That phrase may sound dramatic or abstract right now. What exactly is the nightmare? What does “cyclic” mean? These questions will become central as we proceed. For now, just note the metaphor: awakening from a dream you didn’t know you were having.

But the big question is: what exactly did he discover? What is this “Dharma” that forms the second jewel?

What to watch for: Four key analogies that characterize how Buddhist teaching works. The question of whether Buddhism is psychology, philosophy, or religion—and why that question matters. The introduction of a framework that will structure much of what we study ahead.

The Dharma

Duration: 14 minutes

We’ve now encountered four analogies the Buddha reportedly used to characterize his teaching—and each one complicates any simple categorization of what Buddhism is.

The Arrow suggests pragmatic urgency: don’t speculate about metaphysics while you’re bleeding. Remove the arrow first. The Goldsmith insists on empirical testing: don’t accept teachings on faith, but verify them in your own experience. The Raft acknowledges that even the teachings themselves are provisional tools—useful for crossing, not for carrying on your back forever. And the Dream reframes everything: if ordinary existence is like a nightmare we don’t know we’re having, then “awakening” isn’t metaphorical but descriptive.

These analogies will reappear throughout your study, and their meaning will deepen. The arrow, for instance, might seem to be about avoiding philosophical distraction. But as we progress, we’ll discover that the arrow has a more precise referent—the very mechanism by which dissatisfaction constructs itself moment to moment. The dream analogy might seem poetic now; it becomes technically precise when we examine how the mind fabricates its experience of reality.

We’ve also been introduced to the Four Hallmarks of Buddhist philosophy—a framework that will structure much of what we study in the Small Vehicle floor. We’ll unpack each hallmark carefully in dedicated modules ahead.

The third jewel—Saṅgha, the community of practitioners—weaves through everything we’ll study, but receives focused attention when we examine how Buddhism spread and evolved across cultures. For now, we are that community: people taking up this investigation.

A few Insights:

Why the Three Jewels Matter

When I first encountered the Three Jewels, I thought they were organizational scaffolding—a tidy way to structure introductory material. Teacher, teaching, community. Simple enough.

What changed my understanding was realizing that these three aren’t just categories but orientations. They answer the questions that arise naturally when you try to investigate your own mind seriously: Has anyone done this before me? What did they find? Am I alone in finding this difficult?

The Buddha answers the first question not by offering a figure to worship but by providing proof of concept. Someone investigated this thoroughly. The tradition’s insistence that he was human—not a god, not a prophet—matters enormously. It means the investigation is completable by someone like you.

The Dharma answers the second question, but notice how the four analogies immediately complicate any straightforward answer. You can’t just summarize what the Buddha taught and hand it over. The arrow analogy says: focus on what removes suffering, not on getting your metaphysics right first. The goldsmith analogy says: don’t take my word for it, test everything. The raft analogy says: even what I’m telling you is provisional. The dream analogy says: the whole framework you’re using to understand this is itself part of what you’re waking up from.

This is not how most teachings present themselves. It’s an unusual epistemological stance—one that invites investigation rather than belief.

The Saṅgha answers the third question. You’re not alone. Across twenty-five centuries, across radically different cultures, people have taken up this same inquiry. Some found what they were looking for. The community exists not to tell you what to think but to hold the question open.

What draws you to this material? That question is worth sitting with.

Questions for Reflection

These questions are for your own investigation. You might explore them through ordinary reflection, through journaling, or—if you choose—through contemplative inquiry during meditation. There are no right answers to report.

1. Achievable Awakening The Buddha is presented as a human being who achieved something—not a god, not a prophet, but someone who completed an investigation. Does this framing change how you relate to the material? What difference does it make whether “awakening” is something only special beings attain versus something theoretically achievable by anyone?

2. The Testing Invitation The goldsmith analogy invites you to test teachings in your own experience rather than accepting them on faith. What would it actually mean to “test” a teaching? How is that different from just thinking about whether it seems right? What role might your meditation experience play in such testing?

3. Surface and Depth Several terms were introduced in this module—“painful nightmare,” “cyclic existence,” “awakening,” the four analogies. You have a surface understanding of these now. Notice what questions they raise for you. What do you not yet understand about what these terms might mean?

4. Provisional Tools The raft analogy suggests that teachings are tools for crossing, not possessions to carry forever. Does this framing appeal to you or unsettle you? What would it mean to hold teachings provisionally rather than as fixed truths?

5. Your Entry Point The Three Jewels framework asks: Who investigated this? What did they find? Who else is investigating? Which of these three questions feels most alive for you right now? What brought you to this material in the first place?

Return to Foundation Syllabus