Conditioning Forces — Part 1
NEUTRAL, POSITIVE, AND NEGATIVE FORCES
First Floor - Small Vehicle • Module 13
Introduction: The Chef in the Kitchen
Video 1: Conditioning Forces Overview
Video 2: Neutral: Five Omnipresent and Five Object-Determining
Video 3: Positive: Eleven Mental Activities
Estimated time to complete: 80 minutes
The Chef in the Kitchen
You walk into a coffee shop. The smell hits you first — something warm, roasted, faintly sweet. Before you’ve formed a single thought, something is already happening: consciousness has made contact with the aroma. A feeling has registered — pleasant. A conception has labeled it — “coffee.” Your attention has turned toward it. And now, without deciding to, you want one.
All of that took about half a second. And within it, according to the Abhidharma analysis you are about to study, at least ten distinct mental forces were operating simultaneously — shaping what you noticed, how it felt, what you wanted, and what you did next. You didn’t choose any of it. It just happened, the way it always happens, hundreds of thousands of times per day.
The previous module introduced the fourth aggregate (skandha) — conditioning forces (saṃskāra) — as the massive category containing everything that is neither matter nor consciousness. This module begins unpacking it. The Buddhist tradition compares the five aggregates to a meal: matter is the bowl, feelings are the food, conceptions are the spices — and the conditioning forces are the chef who prepares the entire karmic dish that consciousness then experiences. We are about to meet the chef and watch how the kitchen operates.
A practical note before we begin: these categories may at first seem abstract — just lists and definitions. But recall what vipaśyanā’s first stage requires. Labeling. In order to investigate experience directly, you need categories precise enough to label what you’re actually encountering. That’s exactly what the Abhidharma is providing here. These aren’t categories for memorization — they’re categories for recognition. The question isn’t “can we recite the eleven positive mental factors?” or “can we notice when each one of them is present?” It’s “can we recognize some of these more than others in our mental habits?” and “which of these would we like to increase or decrease, and why?”
What to watch for: How the fourth aggregate functions as a “grab bag” containing everything not already covered by matter and consciousness. The two main types of conditioning forces — mental and nonmental/nonmaterial — and why putting “mental” in the title of this aggregate creates problems. The six subgroups and their karmic valences.
Video 1: Conditioning Forces Overview
Duration: 9 minutes
A Periodic Table for the Mind
The overview maps the full territory we will cover across this module and the next. What matters at this stage is the organizing principle: karmic valence. Each of these forces is classified not by what it feels like or how complex it is, but by whether it moves experience toward benefit, toward harm, or sits neutrally in the background. That principle — the karmic direction of a mental force — is the thread connecting every category that follows.
What to watch for: How the five omnipresent forces unfold in rapid-fire sequence in every moment of consciousness. Then how the five object-determining forces shape what you actually pick out of the vast field of awareness. Listen especially for the shopping analogy: how your inclination toward something activates mindfulness of it, concentration on it, and discernment about it — all before you’ve made any deliberate decision.
Video 2: Neutral: Five Omnipresent and Five Object-Determining
Duration: 14 minutes
Already Running
Here is the striking practical implication: when Buddhist teachers say “develop your mindfulness” or “strengthen your concentration,” they are not asking you to create something that doesn’t exist. According to this analysis, mindfulness and concentration are already present in every moment of consciousness. What practice develops is their strength — turning a flickering awareness into a steady one. Meditation, from this perspective, is not about acquiring new mental capacities. It is about strengthening the ones that are already running.
It is worth noting that modern neuroscience can find correlates for much of what this video describes. Attention, concentration, intention — these show up in brain scans as measurable neural activity. The brain clearly plays a role in how these conditioning forces operate. But keep in mind — and this is a distinction we will return to — finding correlates for the mind’s habitual patterns of reactivity is not the same thing as explaining why there is conscious experience at all. The conditioning forces are the karmic activity of consciousness — how it habitually reacts when objects appear. But the fact that there is appearance in the first place, that there is something it is like to experience at all, is a different question entirely. Without that distinction in mind, we won’t see how the Four Applications of Mindfulness aim to change our habits from the top down—starting with awareness, not from some sort of brain chemistry—without denying the effect that the brain has on experience.
What to watch for: The recipe metaphor — the first ten forces are ingredients in every recipe, while these eleven are the optional ingredients that change the flavor. The three stages of faith and why this is an affective quality rather than a cognitive belief. The 10 dollar example distinguishing self-respect from conscientiousness. The Michael Jordan analogy for praśrabdhi. And the connections to practices you have already encountered: loving kindness, compassion, and equanimity from the Four Immeasurables are grounded in these positive conditioning forces.
Video 3: Positive: Eleven Mental Activities
Duration: 21 minutes
Not Rules but Forces
These eleven are not commandments. They are qualities of mind that, when present, move experience in a beneficial direction. And notice the structural claim at the end: all positive mental states, however they might be named or experienced, are said to be reducible to or grounded in these eleven. The Abhidharma is claiming you don’t need an infinite list of virtues. Everything wholesome traces back to this set.
The next video examines what the Abhidharma tradition considers the core habits that cause suffering—these are not external circumstances, not bad luck, but six root “emotional infections.” Keep in mind that this list of six emotional infections highlights four of the five emotional infections as “root” infections and expands on ignorance. The missing fifth—jealousy—is discussed later as a subsidiary rather than a root infection.
What to watch for: Why kleśha is translated as “infection” rather than “emotion” — because the list includes things we would never call emotions. The addiction metaphor for attachment (rāga) — invisible strings tugging at you, not a pleasant fondness but a painful compulsion. The seven types of pride (māna) as progressive degrees of bloatedness. The two types of ignorance (avidyā) — co-emergent ignorance baked into every moment of consciousness, and imagined ignorance layered on top. And the five wrong beliefs (dṛṣṭi) that seal the system shut — including the sobering warning about clinging to vows.
Video 4: Negative: Six Root Emotional Infections
Duration: 21 minutes
Not a Catalog of Emotions
One of the first things to notice about these fifty-one conditioning forces is what they are not. You will not find “sadness” on this list, or “excitement,” or “nostalgia.” The Abhidharma is not classifying how experience feels — it is classifying karmic direction. Sadness might accompany a positive state (close to compassion) or a negative one (self-pity driven by attachment). The emotion is not the point. The karmic direction is.
With this framework now in view, try the next level of labeling. In the previous module, you practiced identifying which aggregate your experience belonged to — matter, feeling, conception, conditioning force, or consciousness. Now try bringing vividly to mind a memory of one “positive,” “negative,” and “neutral” mental factor that you experienced previously. We start with memory rather than real-time observation for a practical reason: these forces are difficult to catch during meditation. Awareness itself shifts the conditions — the very act of looking undermines the ignorance that fosters their growth, and the conceptual effort of trying to label them competes with their arising. We also tend to have stronger habitual propensities for some forces over others, while the immediate triggers for the rest may simply not be present during a given session. By first recognizing each force’s flavor through recollection, we build the familiarity needed to spot them when they arise naturally later on.
For Buddhists, the “positive” is supposed to be internally self-satisfying or pleasant and leads to benefit. The “negative” is supposed to be internally unsatisfying or unpleasant and leads to harm. Does that track with your experience? Keep in mind that a moment of perseverance might feel positive despite physical fatigue. A moment of attachment might feel delicious but has a bad taste. So we need to look past the surface feeling to the force beneath it. Try on the meditation to tune into the “positive,” “negative,” or “neutral” mental factors underlying the different stories we tell ourselves about our circumstances or our lives, like the background music in a movie that shapes the way we understand the images.
✦ A few Insights:
The Buddhist tradition is not ultimately asking you to accept this or any framework on authority. What it is asking is that you investigate for yourself — that is what vipaśyanā is for. The whole arc of this curriculum is designed to give you the tools to look at your own experience with enough precision to form your own conclusions about what consciousness is, how it relates to the body you inhabit, and what that means for the life you are living. How you answer these questions shapes your understanding of what it means to be alive and what is possible for a human being. The Buddhist position is that you should not leave questions this important to so-called experts, whether they wear lab coats or monastic robes. You should look for yourself.
That said, to help us clarify and refine our own conclusions, on the Great Vehicle floor, we will study comparatively four distinct philosophical frameworks for understanding the causal relationship between mind, conditioning forces, and matter. Even though the Buddhist schools were formed in the absence of modern scientific discoveries, they would push back, as I noted previously, against modern physicalist neuroscientists who assume that finding brain correlates for the conditioning forces is somehow the same as explaining the causality of consciousness itself.
As the philosopher Bernardo Kastrup has argued, no one would deny that neuroscience can tell us which brain region activates when we see the color red. But nothing about those correlations proves causal direction. There is nothing about quantities — electrical charges, chemical concentrations, network topology — from which we could deduce, even in principle, the quality of an experience. Even the correlations we do have are known only as brute empirical facts — observed after the fact, never predicted from the physics. Furthermore, as Kastrup points out, even though the standard assumption is that the brain produces consciousness, the very same data is equally compatible with other theories about consciousness, such as the theory that the brain is a filter or modulator of consciousness rather than the generator of it. Imagine an alien were to discover a radio playing music. When he turns the tuner, the station changes. When he smashes the speaker, it distorts. When he pulls the plug, it stops playing. Would he correctly conclude that the radio was the generator of the music? Obviously not, but the interpretation that the radio is merely a receiver or filter of the sound waves eludes him. Kastrup, pointing to recent psilocybin studies, also argues that the most profound subjective experiences correlate with significantly decreased brain activity, not increased — difficult to explain if the brain generates consciousness, but straightforward if it is just a filter constraining it.
To be clear, this course will never ask you to accept any particular theory about how consciousness and the brain relate. But to cultivate the kind of curiosity required for first person vipaśhyanā research into the nature of consciousness, we need to question our unexamined assumption that neuroscience has solved the problem and in so doing, defined the scope of life and the degree to which we can transform our experience of it through introspection.
? Questions for Reflection
These are not comprehension questions. They are observation prompts — invitations to observe and reflect on your own experience over the coming days and weeks.
1. Feeling vs. Karmic Valence Continue the labeling exercise introduced above — sitting quietly, labeling whatever arises as “positive,” “negative,” or “neutral” by karmic direction. This time, pay particular attention to mismatches. Can you catch a moment where something feels pleasant but you suspect the underlying force is negative? Or where something feels uncomfortable but the force beneath it is positive? The more you notice these mismatches, the sharper your sense of karmic valence becomes.
2. What Pulls You The next time you notice a strong desire — for food, for approval, for distraction — investigate whether it has the quality of “invisible strings.” Is this a free choice, or does it feel more like a pull you can’t easily resist? The distinction between ordinary desire and the compulsive quality described as rāga may become more apparent when you watch it in real time.
3. The Bloatedness Check Over the next week, notice moments of comparison — feeling better than someone, worse than someone, equal to someone. When the comparison arises, ask: does this feel like bloatedness? Does the act of comparing and positioning yourself feel comfortable, or does it carry a kind of strain? You don’t need to judge it. Just notice the quality.
4. Positive Forces in Real Time Can you catch a moment when one of the eleven positive forces is clearly present — faith as that quiet trust, self-respect as the dignity that steers you away from something beneath you, equanimity as an even, unshakeable calm? Noticing these is just as important as noticing the infections. The Abhidharma isn’t only a map of what goes wrong — it’s a map of what’s already going right.
5. Mind-Stuff The next time you are in meditation and a strong thought or emotion arises, try this experiment: instead of attending to its content (what you’re thinking about), attend to its substance. What is this thought made of? Can you find anything material in it — any weight, shape, location? The Abhidharma says these conditioning forces are made of mind-stuff, not matter. Does your own investigation confirm that, complicate it, or leave the question open?
Technical issues with this module, or something is not quite right? Contact us and let us know!