Vipaśhyanā Practice — Four Kinds & Four Stages

HOW INSIGHT INVESTIGATES

The Pivot

We have spent the last two modules building a precision instrument. Śhamatha meditation teaches the mind to settle—to focus the microscope and calmly look through it. By opening our heart toward others, we saw how the Four Immeasurables practice deepened and expanded our understanding of calmness and its links to ethical conduct. But a focused, flexible mind is not the ultimate goal of Buddhist meditation. It is the prerequisite. The question now becomes: what do we do with this tool?

According to Buddhist meditation theory, śhamatha meditation builds the microscope and helps us focus, but vipaśhyanā meditation uses it to do systematic research into the impermanence, suffering, and emptiness of our worldly experience—the first three hallmarks taught in the Ground section. When applying mindfulness specifically to our body, feelings, and mind, we have already asked ourselves central vipaśhyanā research questions: “Is this lasting?” “Is this pleasant?” “Is this me?” But before jumping in to the more complex practice of applying mindfulness to all phenomena—the fourth application of mindfulness—we need to get more precise about vipaśhyanā meditation and why it requires us to study Buddhist phenomenology in more detail.

This module presents a basic theoretical map of vipaśhyanā so that we can understand how the vipaśhyanā aspect of mindfulness of phenomena aims to bring greater clarity and meaningfulness into our lives. The two lectures below lay out the four kinds of vipaśhyanā and the four stages through which each kind of investigation deepens. Subsequent modules then introduce the phenomenological categories and mental factors needed to begin the first stages of formal investigation.

What to watch for: The four different depths at which vipaśhyanā can operate—and how the Small Vehicle approach gets at the roots of emotional suffering in a way that common approaches do not. The example of anger and what happens when we look for the “me” that is being hurt. The brief preview of Great Vehicle and Diamond Vehicle approaches—seeds for later comparisons.

Video 1: Four Kinds of Vipaśhyanā

Duration: 30 minutes

What Vipaśhyanā Investigates at Each Depth

What matters most for where we are now is the Small Vehicle kind of vipaśhyanā, which culminates in realizing the emptiness of personal identity that we investigated in the Third Hallmark. The common vipaśhyanā pulls weeds at the surface. But the Small Vehicle goes after the root system by investigating the personal identity on which our emotional reactions are structured. The Great Vehicle extends this investigation to all phenomena, and the Diamond Vehicle looks directly at the nature of mind — both of which will unfold on subsequent floors.

It is extremely helpful to understand this connection intellectually and to contemplate the meaning of what is explained about the hallmarks in the Ground section. But genuine vipaśhyanā investigation requires some degree of meditative concentration — using the calm, focused mind developed through śhamatha meditation to search for identity in real time — or else it will not have any profound or lasting effect on one’s thoughts, feelings, or perceptions.

What to watch for: The puzzle-piece analogy for labeling—the crucial first step. The distinction between the two conceptual stages and the two non-conceptual stages. The onion with no core. How the breath technique can serve as a stepping stone toward vipaśhyanā. The relationship between analytical investigation and direct seeing.

Video 2: Four Stages of Vipaśhyanā

Duration: 51minutes

Where We Are — and What Comes Next

Vipaśhyanā investigation deepens through four stages: labeling, ontological analysis, non-conceptual discernment, and intense inspection. The first stage involves something deceptively simple: putting a label on whatever we are experiencing moment to moment. But to label precisely, we first need to learn a set of labels and how to use them in practice— and that is what the next several modules will provide.

The Buddhist tradition developed remarkably detailed phenomenological categories to sharpen investigation — the five aggregates, the different types of mental factors, perceptions, conceptions, and feelings. These may sound like a steep hill to climb. But once we are at the top of it, we will quickly see how fundamentally it shifts the way we see and understand ourselves, the world around us, and the four applications of mindfulness as a method.

In the meantime, we will introduce the first stage of vipaśhyanā meditation with the guided meditation below. This simplifies the practice of labeling to a single label to get a sense of what phenomenological investigation tastes like. More refined investigation becomes possible once we have the phenomenological vocabulary.

The guided meditation will also mix in a bit of the second stage — ontological analysis — based on the research questions we have been building throughout the curriculum. In doing this, we should drop any expectations of either finding or not finding something when we look— and focus instead on cultivating an active open-minded curiosity that observes objectively without self-judgment. Learning to investigate things in this way is what shifts something inside us.

The third and fourth stages move beyond conceptual analysis into direct, non-conceptual seeing — territory the lecture described. According to the tradition, it may take years of very consistent and devoted practice to completely break through to these profound insights, but glimpses of them are accessible to us from the start. We will continue to cultivate these glimpses as the curriculum unfolds.

What to watch for: This meditation walks through all four applications of mindfulness in sequence — body, feelings, mind, and phenomena — and then settles into the simplest form of labeling practice. It introduces one technique for working with thoughts and one question that will deepen considerably as we learn more precise categories for what our experience actually consists of.

In the meantime, it is very helpful to practice one or all of the four applications of mindfulness consistently—preferably daily at least one time briefly. If possible, it is best to add also a brief meditation on at least one of the four immeasurables. We can practice this in the very abbreviated form of sending out with our breath the wish that all beings find happiness or in the expanded form by following the script in one or all of the recordings from the prior module. The emphasis here is consistency. Quality can be improved over time.

Video 3: Guided Meditation – Mindfulness of Phenomena: Me-ness

Duration: 16 minutes

✦ A few Insights:

When I began learning about this topic, nobody explained to me the difference between the vipaśhyanā aspect of all Buddhist meditation techniques, the formal vipaśhyanā meditation, and the resulting vipaśhyanā itself. Firstly, every meditation technique can be said to have both a śhamatha aspect and a vipaśhyanā aspect. Take the Four Immeasurables as an example: the initial contemplations on equanimity and impartiality—where we use conceptual reasoning to consider why all beings equally deserve our goodwill—are the vipaśhyanā aspect of that practice. It is only once loving-kindness, compassion, sympathetic joy, or equanimity actually arises and we rest non-conceptually in that feeling, focused on it as a meditative object, that we are practicing the Four Immeasurables as śhamatha meditation. Similarly, the breath technique has a vipaśhyanā aspect—the natural curiosity that arises in the space between awareness of one breath and another. Secondly, formal vipaśhyanā meditation, as described in this small vehicle module, involves deliberately using research questions and phenomenological categories to investigate experience. Initially the meditation involves applying these conceptual frameworks, but it actually aims to transcend them. Thirdly, the liberating insight of vipaśhyanā itself is often experienced as an indescribably profound glimpse of the extra-ordinary ordinariness of things that is always in plain sight but constantly overlooked. Many beginning meditators imagine that such a glimpse will occur during a meditation session. But often it occurs instead as an experiential aftereffect (pṛṣthalabdhajñāna) of having immersed ourselves in meditation for a period—while going about our lives.

As for the four kinds, one might wonder: if common vipaśhyanā already works—if therapy, reflection, and willpower can help us let go of grudges and manage our emotions—why bother with anything more? It may be worth noting, in fact, that all three founders of modern Western psychology were inspired by their encounter with Buddhism at the turn of the twentieth century: Sigmund Freud, who even quotes the Buddha in Civilization and its Discontents; Carl Jung, who studied Buddhism and Hinduism extensively; and William James, who professed to be a Buddhist in his postscript to The Varieties of Religious Experience. So the connection between Buddhist investigation of mind and Western psychological inquiry runs deeper than many people realize, and many contemporary forms of therapy were directly or indirectly inspired by Buddhist psychology. Contemporary psychology has of course developed many other beneficial frameworks and tools—which meditators would do well to explore. But according to the Small Vehicle, no matter how deep such forms of common vipaśhyanā go—whether ancient or modern—they are only pulling weeds without getting rid of the roots. They address the emotional disruptions that paralyze us, but the Buddhist tradition aims to uproot those emotions entirely by investigating their deepest source: our unexamined assumptions of a fixed personal identity around which our emotions are structured. On the Great Vehicle and Diamond Vehicle floors, we will see how the investigation can be extended to other territories as well.

One final note on the relationship between study and practice. The prerequisite for vipaśhyanā is a curious, inquisitive, open mind — and a willingness to look at our own experience with honesty. Studying Buddhist phenomenology naturally cultivates this: learning the categories of experience makes us more curious about what we are actually experiencing, sharper and more objective in observing it. This self-reflective curiosity can operate whether or not we are formally meditating because we can always investigate our experience through the Buddhist frameworks once we learn them. However, śhamatha helps us focus on the research questions long enough to gather enough evidence so that we arrive at genuine insight rather than just fleeting impressions. So while moving forward in the modules, it is essential to continue practicing the guided meditations — the Four Immeasurables, the mindfulness of body, feelings, and mind, and now the “thinking” meditation above. As the next modules introduce the five aggregates and the conditioning forces, the labels will become more precise, and the investigation will deepen accordingly.

? Questions for Reflection

These are not comprehension questions. They are observation prompts—invitations to investigate through continued practice and to experiment with reframing or refining the questions themselves.

1. The Pain of the Emotion Over the next few days, notice a moment of emotional reactivity—frustration, jealousy, irritation, anxiety—and simply observe: what is the pain of carrying this? Not the situation, but the emotional state itself. Is carrying this grudge or this worry actually serving you?

2. Who Is Being Hurt? The next time a strong emotion arises—being cut off in traffic, a critical comment, an unexpected disappointment—try asking: what is the “me” that feels hurt or threatened here? Where exactly does the sting land? Can you locate the “me” that is its target?

3. Labeling in Daily Life Try carrying the “thinking” label from the guided meditation into ordinary moments — waiting in line, walking between rooms, pausing before a meal. When you notice your mind has wandered into planning, remembering, or reacting, silently label it “thinking” and return to whatever you were doing. Does the act of labeling change the quality of attention? Does it feel different to label once and return versus getting caught up in analyzing what you were thinking about?

4. The Stepping Stone Return to the śhamatha-vipaśhyanā breath technique from the first Foundation module. This time, notice the vipaśhyanā aspect more deliberately—during the gaps between breaths, or when counting settles, what does the mind naturally become curious about? Is that curiosity present in your practice, even if subtle?

5. The Map and the Territory This module presented a theoretical map—four kinds, four stages. As you sit with this framework over the coming weeks, notice: does having the map change how you experience the territory? Does knowing that the tradition describes a path from labeling to direct observation affect your motivation or your expectations? And if it does—is that helpful, or could it get in the way?

Technical issues with this module, or something is not quite right? Contact us and let us know!